Connect with us

Technology

Lord Miles Creates ‘Most Secure’ Phone, Then Reverts to Samsung

Editorial

Published

on

British YouTuber and self-described “danger tourist,” Miles Routledge, known as Lord Miles, has garnered attention for his extreme approach to smartphone security. Following extensive travel in conflict zones, including Afghanistan and Ukraine, he revealed a heavily modified Google Pixel 10 Pro XL that he claims is the “most secure” device available outside of government use. However, the story takes an unexpected turn as he ultimately opts to use a Samsung phone instead.

In a recent post on X (formerly Twitter), Routledge displayed his creation, which he dubbed the “schizo phone.” This device has been stripped of essential features, including all cameras, the accelerometer, speakers, microphone, and even the temperature sensor. The charging port has been sealed with epoxy, rendering the phone a solid slab. According to his post, which has reached over 4.4 million views, the phone operates on GrapheneOS, a privacy-focused version of Android.

Routledge’s modifications extend beyond software. He incorporated an anti-tamper mechanism that, if the back of the phone is opened, activates a capacitor to deliver a jolt of 80 volts to the device’s memory, effectively erasing data. Additionally, the phone is programmed to restart every ten minutes, requiring the user to input a lengthy password repeatedly. This level of security is particularly relevant for someone like Routledge, who has faced potential detainment by intelligence agencies in his travels.

Charging the device presents a unique challenge, as the absence of a USB-C port means that Routledge relies solely on wireless charging. His rationale is that physical ports can be exploited for data recovery, and by eliminating them, he believes he can enhance security.

Despite the extensive engineering efforts, Routledge humorously acknowledged the impracticality of his creation. Shortly after unveiling the device, he commented on X that he had removed the battery, SIM card tray, motherboard, and screen, leaving him with “just an empty slab of metal.” He ultimately decided to purchase a Samsung phone, enabling all location and data permissions for everyday use while carrying both devices.

This decision illustrates the paradox of modern security measures: the lengths to which individuals will go to maintain privacy often compromise the very functionality that makes smartphones useful. The situation reflects the ongoing struggle for privacy in an increasingly connected world, highlighting the absurdity of needing such extreme modifications to ensure digital security.

While GrapheneOS has not yet commented on this specific iteration of the Pixel 10, the project typically promotes a balance between security and usability. Routledge’s shocking approach, including the 80-volt data destruction mechanism, is unlikely to align with their standard guidelines.

For those unfamiliar with Miles Routledge, his online presence as a “danger tourist” began to gain traction during significant global events, including the fall of Kabul. His experiences in high-risk environments have undoubtedly influenced his radical approach to smartphone security.

As privacy concerns continue to mount, Routledge’s story serves as a humorous yet thought-provoking exploration of the extremes individuals might consider in pursuit of digital security.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.