Congress Urged to Strengthen Chemical Management Law for Innovation

Congress faces a pressing call to enhance the implementation of the nation’s primary chemicals management law, the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). A coalition led by the American Chemistry Council (ACC) emphasizes the need for improved science-driven regulations to maintain America’s leadership in chemical innovation and manufacturing. This initiative aims to bolster the U.S. economy, which heavily relies on chemistry across various sectors.

The ACC, alongside over 100 stakeholders from prominent manufacturing trade organizations, recently sent a letter to bipartisan leaders in both the House and Senate. They urged Congress to refine the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) ongoing efforts under TSCA, which is crucial for safeguarding public health and the environment while fostering innovation.

“TSCA was designed to foster innovation and economic growth while protecting human health and the environment,” the coalition stated in their correspondence. This diverse group, representing leading manufacturers, advocates for a risk-based, science-driven approach to chemical management, highlighting the importance of effective regulations that adapt to modern challenges.

History of TSCA and Recent Challenges

TSCA, originally enacted over 40 years ago, underwent its first major amendment in June 2016 with the passage of the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act. These reforms were intended to ensure that the EPA’s chemical evaluations are based on the best available scientific evidence. This includes using transparent and reliable data while considering all relevant information during assessments.

As Congress approaches a critical deadline to review and reauthorize TSCA’s fee structure before September 30, 2026, stakeholders are emphasizing the need for targeted improvements. Coalition leaders argue that nearly a decade after the 2016 reforms, it is time to enhance scientific standards, ensure timely reviews, and reduce regulatory uncertainty for manufacturers.

The need for these improvements is underscored by the growing demand for innovative chemicals. However, systemic delays in the TSCA New Chemicals review process have hindered the production of new substances in the United States, impacting innovation and competitiveness.

Addressing TSCA Fees and Future Implications

Under TSCA, the EPA has the authority to collect fees from chemical manufacturers, importers, and processors to support the law’s implementation. These user fees are essential for funding evaluations of both new and existing chemicals. Without proper congressional reauthorization, the EPA’s ability to collect these fees will cease, jeopardizing timely chemical reviews and the introduction of new substances into the market.

The coalition asserts that this deadline presents an opportunity for Congress to exercise its oversight power effectively. Improving TSCA will not only support American manufacturers but also enhance the country’s position in the global market.

A robust TSCA is vital for consumers, communities, and the broader U.S. economy. Strengthening the framework for chemical management can help ensure that the manufacturing sector remains competitive on a global scale. The ACC and its partners believe that practical reforms to TSCA are essential for maintaining America’s competitive edge in chemistry.

In conclusion, the coalition is calling for a collective effort to implement these necessary changes. By providing the EPA with adequate resources and promoting a risk-based approach, Congress can help fortify America’s status as a global manufacturing leader. The future of chemical innovation and economic growth hinges on the swift action of lawmakers to support the critical updates to TSCA.