Testing the Dyson Airwrap i.d. and Dreame Pocket Neo: Which Reigns Supreme?

The launch of the Dyson Airwrap i.d. in August 2024 has sparked renewed interest in the hair styling market, especially as consumers increasingly seek high-performance tools. In a comparative test against the more budget-friendly Dreame Pocket Neo, both devices were evaluated on performance, design, and usability to help potential buyers decide which product suits them best.

Performance Comparison: Speed and Efficiency

The Dyson Airwrap i.d. promises a revolutionary styling experience with less heat damage compared to traditional tools. Priced at $599 in the United States and £479 in the United Kingdom, its advanced technology aims to deliver sleek styles while maintaining hair health. Users can expect to achieve a styled look in under 20 minutes, with an airflow speed of 110,000 RPM, which is quite powerful yet operates quietly at 74 dB.

In contrast, the Dreame Pocket Neo, available for approximately $159 in the U.S. and £119 in the U.K., offers an impressive performance at a fraction of the cost. This compact device also operates at 110,000 RPM, but its design may lead to hair tangling, even at the lowest speed setting. Despite this, many users find it easy to achieve a good styling experience quickly.

Design and User Experience

When comparing the design of both air stylers, the Dyson Airwrap i.d. comes with six attachments, including curling barrels and a flyaway tamer, providing users with versatility. The main device measures 10.7 x 1.9 x 1.6 inches and weighs 1.3 pounds, making it a robust styling option. The ease of attachment switching adds to its appeal for those looking to create various styles.

On the other hand, the Dreame Pocket Neo is significantly smaller at 7.91 x 5.71 x 1.97 inches and weighs just 0.66 pounds. This lightweight design enhances its portability, making it an excellent choice for travelers. However, it only comes with two attachments, which may limit styling options for users seeking more control and variety.

Both devices feature multiple heat settings, with the Dyson offering three speed options compared to the Dreame’s two. This flexibility allows users of the Dyson to better manage airflow and temperature during styling.

Styling Results: Curling and Smoothing

The Dyson Airwrap has gained a reputation for its ability to produce voluminous curls with minimal effort. Users can easily set curls by utilizing its cold shot feature, which helps lock styles in place. The tension created by the Airwrap during curling effectively reduces frizz, resulting in smoother finishes.

In comparison, while the Dreame Pocket Neo offers quick curling capabilities, it lacks the same level of control. Users may notice increased frizz due to the absence of the specialized smoothing tools found in the Dyson lineup. Many found themselves needing to rely on additional techniques to manage frizz post-styling, which can be a drawback for those with textured hair.

Both tools utilize ionic technology to expedite drying times. However, the Dyson’s dedicated drying attachment provides better control over airflow, making it easier to achieve desired styling results without excessive tangling.

In summary, the Dyson Airwrap i.d. excels in offering a comprehensive styling experience with its array of attachments and effective smoothing capabilities. However, its premium price may deter some consumers. The Dreame Pocket Neo, while less versatile and prone to causing tangles, serves as a commendable alternative for budget-conscious individuals seeking quick and portable styling solutions.

Ultimately, those willing to invest in more consistent performance and a wider range of styling options may find the Dyson Airwrap i.d. worth the cost. Conversely, the Dreame Pocket Neo remains an attractive choice for those prioritizing affordability and ease of use.