Connect with us

Lifestyle

Ex-Prince Andrew Faces Name Change as Buckingham Palace Reconsiders

Editorial

Published

on

Buckingham Palace is reevaluating how to officially style the name of ex-Prince Andrew. The decision may lead to a hyphen being added between Mountbatten and Windsor, aligning with the wishes of the late Queen Elizabeth II. Currently recognized as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor, the addition of a hyphen offers little comfort following the loss of numerous royal titles due to his controversial associations, particularly his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein.

Andrew has relinquished titles such as the Duke of York, the Earl of Inverness, and the Baron Killyleagh. He also lost the prestigious designation of His Royal Highness, along with various honorary military positions and patronages. Sources close to the situation indicate that the Palace is reconsidering the hyphen after realizing that the late Queen specified in a 1960 declaration that her descendants, excluding those with royal titles, would carry the name Mountbatten-Windsor.

In a notice published in The London Gazette just two weeks prior to Andrew’s birth, Queen Elizabeth stated: “Now therefore I declare My Will and Pleasure that, while I and My children shall continue to be styled and known as the House and Family of Windsor, My descendants other than descendants enjoying the style, title or attribute of Royal Highness… shall bear the name of Mountbatten-Windsor.” This decision was influenced by Prince Philip, who felt that he was “the only man in the country not allowed to give his name to his children.”

The 1960 declaration made Andrew the first royal baby officially associated with the surname Mountbatten-Windsor. Now that he has lost both his title of Prince and the HRH designation, some royal commentators argue it is appropriate for Buckingham Palace to adhere strictly to the late Queen’s wishes, including the hyphen.

Historical Context and Precedents

Royal historian Ian Lloyd expressed surprise to the *London Times* that Andrew’s name was ever printed without the hyphen, given both tradition and the precise wording of Queen Elizabeth II. The hyphenated surname is not uncommon in royal documentation. For example, Princess Anne’s marriage certificate from 1973 lists her as Anne Elizabeth Alice Louise Mountbatten-Windsor, while Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor was similarly styled on his birth certificate in 2019.

While the use of hyphens in royal names and titles is generally clear, it can sometimes vary in less formal contexts. The late Queen Mother was known as Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon on official documents, but newspapers often omitted the hyphen. Similarly, figures such as Andrew Parker Bowles and Helena Bonham Carter do not use hyphens in their names, and Andrew Lloyd Webber has never included one.

The case of Mountbatten-Windsor is distinct, as it stems from a royal directive rather than personal choice. As Buckingham Palace deliberates on Andrew’s name, sources suggest that a hyphenated form may soon become standard for him. This decision would underscore the importance of adhering to royal protocol and the legacy of the late Queen.

While the outcome remains to be seen, it is clear that the matter of Andrew’s name carries significant historical weight and familial ties, reflecting the complexities of modern royal life.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.