Connect with us

Science

Lily-Like Plants Unveil Evolution of Centromere Types

Editorial

Published

on

Recent research has provided significant insights into the evolution of centromeres, the essential components for chromosome transport during cell division. A team at the Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK) examined the genomes of two closely related lily-like plant species, revealing distinct evolutionary paths for their centromeres. Their findings, published in the journal Nature Communications on December 22, 2025, challenge previous assumptions about centromere evolution.

Most organisms, including plants and animals, typically possess a single, localized centromere per chromosome, known as a monocentromere. However, approximately 350,000 species, including nematodes and various plants, have a different type known as a holocentromere, characterized by multiple smaller centromeres distributed along the entire length of the chromosome. This configuration allows for more effective responses to chromosome breaks, reducing the risk of losing genetic material during cell division.

The IPK research team focused on comparing a species with a large monocentromere, Chamaelirium luteum, and a holocentric species, Chionographis japonica. According to Prof. Dr. Andreas Houben, the head of the research group, initial expectations were that a large centromere would evolve into an elongated form in a linear progression. Instead, the research uncovered that holocentric chromosomes developed independently from those with macromonocentric centromeres.

Dr. Yi-Tzu Kuo, the study’s first author, elaborated on the findings, stating that “the evolution of centromere types is driven by a complex interplay of gene mutations, epigenetic changes, and centromeric DNA expansion.” The research revealed that while the centromeric proportion of the overall genome is around 15% in both species, the distribution and structural characteristics are markedly different.

For the first time, the team successfully sequenced the giant monocentromere of Chamaelirium luteum, providing a clearer understanding of its structure. This extensive analysis highlighted the unique evolutionary trajectories of these plants’ centromeres, expanding the scientific community’s knowledge of centromere diversity.

Dr. Pavel Neumann, a co-author from the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, emphasized the importance of studying non-model species for evolutionary comparisons. He stated, “This makes it possible to discover new features, even in structures that have been well studied, such as the centromere.”

The implications of this research extend beyond the specific species studied, offering valuable insights into the fundamental processes of genetic transmission and the evolutionary mechanisms that shape plant and animal genomes. The discoveries pave the way for further studies into centromere function and evolution, potentially informing agricultural practices and conservation efforts.

This research not only enhances our understanding of plant genetics but also underscores the intricate relationships between genetic structure and evolutionary outcomes. Further investigations will likely continue to unravel the complexities of centromere evolution and its broader implications in biology.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.