Education
New Study Reveals Income Disparities in Ivy-Plus College Admissions
A recent study examining college admissions has revealed significant disparities based on family income, particularly regarding Ivy-Plus institutions. Researchers Raj Chetty, David J. Deming, and John N. Friedman utilized anonymized admissions data from multiple colleges, linking it with income tax records and standardized test scores such as the SAT and ACT. Their findings indicate that children from families in the top 1% of income earners are more than twice as likely to enroll in Ivy-Plus colleges compared to middle-class peers with similar test scores.
The analysis highlights that two-thirds of the gap in admissions rates can be attributed to higher acceptance rates for students from affluent backgrounds. The remaining third is influenced by differences in application and matriculation rates. Notably, this admissions advantage does not extend to flagship public colleges, where high-income students do not enjoy similar benefits.
Factors Influencing Admissions Disparities
The study identifies three primary factors contributing to the admissions advantage experienced by high-income families at Ivy-Plus colleges. First, preferences for children of alumni play a significant role in admissions decisions. Second, these institutions place considerable weight on non-academic credentials, which can disproportionately benefit wealthier applicants. Lastly, the athletic recruitment process often favors students from affluent backgrounds.
The researchers employed a novel approach to isolate variations in admissions decisions for waitlisted applicants. Their findings suggest that attending an Ivy-Plus college, rather than the average flagship public college, increases a student’s likelihood of reaching the top 1% of the earnings distribution by 50%. Additionally, students from Ivy-Plus colleges are nearly twice as likely to attend elite graduate schools and almost three times more likely to secure positions at prestigious firms.
The Role of Academic Credentials
Interestingly, the study underscores that the three factors providing an advantage to high-income students are either uncorrelated or negatively correlated with post-college success. In contrast, academic credentials, such as SAT and ACT scores, are proven to be strong predictors of success after college. This suggests that standardized tests can help lower-income students gain access to top-tier institutions compared to alternative metrics.
These findings raise important questions about the equity of the admissions process at prestigious universities. As the gap between income levels continues to impact students’ educational opportunities, the study advocates for a reevaluation of admissions practices to foster greater inclusivity and fairness.
The research conducted by Chetty, Deming, and Friedman provides critical insights into the dynamics of college admissions, emphasizing the need for reforms that ensure all students, regardless of their economic background, have equitable access to higher education.
-
Science1 month agoNostradamus’ 2026 Predictions: Star Death and Dark Events Loom
-
Technology2 months agoOpenAI to Implement Age Verification for ChatGPT by December 2025
-
Technology7 months agoDiscover the Top 10 Calorie Counting Apps of 2025
-
Health5 months agoBella Hadid Shares Health Update After Treatment for Lyme Disease
-
Health5 months agoAnalysts Project Stronger Growth for Apple’s iPhone 17 Lineup
-
Technology5 months agoElectric Moto Influencer Surronster Arrested in Tijuana
-
Education5 months agoHarvard Secures Court Victory Over Federal Funding Cuts
-
Health5 months agoErin Bates Shares Recovery Update Following Sepsis Complications
-
Technology7 months agoMeta Initiates $60B AI Data Center Expansion, Starting in Ohio
-
Technology6 months agoDiscover How to Reverse Image Search Using ChatGPT Effortlessly
-
Science4 months agoStarship V3 Set for 2026 Launch After Successful Final Test of Version 2
-
Technology7 months agoRecovering a Suspended TikTok Account: A Step-by-Step Guide
