Connect with us

Health

Standard BioTools and Veeva Systems: A Comprehensive Business Comparison

Editorial

Published

on

In a detailed analysis of two prominent companies in the medical sector, Standard BioTools (NASDAQ:LAB) and Veeva Systems (NYSE:VEEV), various factors such as valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, and earnings were compared to determine which company holds a stronger position in the market.

Analyst Recommendations and Price Targets

Current analyst recommendations reveal significant differences in market expectations for both companies. According to MarketBeat.com, Standard BioTools has a consensus target price of $1.35, suggesting a potential upside of 8.87%. In contrast, Veeva Systems boasts a higher target price of $307.28, indicating a potential upside of 4.79%. The higher probable upside for Standard BioTools suggests a more favorable outlook from equities research analysts.

Ownership and Profitability Insights

Ownership structures also highlight contrasting investor confidence levels. Institutional investors hold 53.7% of Standard BioTools shares, compared to a substantial 88.2% ownership in Veeva Systems. Additionally, company insiders own 23.2% of Standard BioTools, while Veeva Systems has insider ownership of 10.3%. High institutional ownership typically reflects a belief among major investors that a company will outperform the market in the long run.

In terms of profitability, Veeva Systems outperforms Standard BioTools in revenue and earnings. However, Standard BioTools currently trades at a lower price-to-earnings ratio, suggesting it may be a more affordable investment option at this time.

Risk and Volatility Analysis

Evaluating market volatility, Standard BioTools has a beta of 1.25, indicating its stock price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500 index. In comparison, Veeva Systems has a beta of 0.98, suggesting its stock is 2% less volatile than that of the S&P 500. These figures imply that investors in Standard BioTools may face greater price fluctuations compared to those in Veeva Systems.

Company Overviews

Standard BioTools Inc., headquartered in South San Francisco, California, provides a range of instruments, consumables, reagents, and software services aimed at researchers and clinical laboratories across various regions, including the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company operates in two segments: Proteomics and Genomics. Key products include the CyTOF XT System for high-parameter single-cell analysis and the X9 Real-Time PCR System for microfluidics-based workflows. Standard BioTools, formerly known as Fluidigm Corporation, rebranded in April 2022.

On the other hand, Veeva Systems Inc., based in Pleasanton, California, specializes in cloud-based software solutions tailored for the life sciences sector. Its offerings include the Veeva Commercial Cloud and Veeva Development Cloud, which encompass various applications for customer relationship management, clinical and regulatory functions, and data analytics. The company was originally incorporated as Verticals onDemand, Inc. in 2007 and rebranded to Veeva Systems Inc. in April 2009.

In summary, while Veeva Systems leads in revenue and profitability, Standard BioTools presents a more attractive potential upside based on analyst targets. Investors will need to weigh the advantages of Veeva’s established market position against the growth potential of Standard BioTools as they make decisions in this evolving healthcare market.

Our Editorial team doesn’t just report the news—we live it. Backed by years of frontline experience, we hunt down the facts, verify them to the letter, and deliver the stories that shape our world. Fueled by integrity and a keen eye for nuance, we tackle politics, culture, and technology with incisive analysis. When the headlines change by the minute, you can count on us to cut through the noise and serve you clarity on a silver platter.

Trending

Copyright © All rights reserved. This website offers general news and educational content for informational purposes only. While we strive for accuracy, we do not guarantee the completeness or reliability of the information provided. The content should not be considered professional advice of any kind. Readers are encouraged to verify facts and consult relevant experts when necessary. We are not responsible for any loss or inconvenience resulting from the use of the information on this site.